| Author |
Message |
    
Cm3885
Intermediate Member
Username: Cm3885
Post Number: 325
Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2004 - 9:55 pm: | 
|
Seems thats the amp of choice by many.. |
Hornet168ky
Member
Username: Hornet168ky
Post Number: 99
Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 10:14 am: |
|
The name Texas Star, should I say more? |
Pig040
Intermediate Member
Username: Pig040
Post Number: 367
Registered: 7-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 10:35 am: |
|
In My opinion just because they are almost bulletproof, they seem to take a lot of abuse and still operate fine. They do well in a rough mobile environment. |
Hornet168ky
Intermediate Member
Username: Hornet168ky
Post Number: 100
Registered: 10-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 3:20 pm: |
|
Yes, Pig040 I would have to agree they are almost like a Timex watch, take a lickin, and keep right on tickin. |
Bullet
Intermediate Member
Username: Bullet
Post Number: 304
Registered: 7-2003
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 5:44 pm: |
|
ill let you know if its "BULLET" proof...lol |
409
Member
Username: 409
Post Number: 50
Registered: 3-2002
| | Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 3:28 am: |
|
Don't know about "Bullet Proof" , but there one of the cleaner amps you'll ever see if you run them correctly. |
Cm3885
Intermediate Member
Username: Cm3885
Post Number: 342
Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Monday, April 12, 2004 - 2:44 pm: |
|
I was looking at the palomar 775 and was considering that one but the 667 looks like its the cleaner of the two.. Heard too many horror stories of how filthy the 775 is! |
