Copper Talk » Product Reviews » Radios » Cobra Question's & Comment's » Is the Cobra 2000 audio better then the new RCI radios? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Audioman
Junior Member
Username: Audioman

Post Number: 28
Registered: 2-2004
Posted on Friday, September 17, 2004 - 4:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I know the Cobra 2000 was king in the 80's.
But, how does it stack up to the new powerful radios like the RCI 2990, RCI 2995, RCI 2985, Galaxy 2517, Galaxy 2527, etc. Besides the obvious like the FM & extra channels, how do the radios compare?
I have owned several RCI & Galaxy radios. The tramsmit audio is incredible. Loud, clear, detailed, etc.
I know the audio on the Cobra 2000 was one of the best ever made. How does the 2000 transmit audio compare to the new base radios.
DO you think that the audio is better on a Cobra 2000 or is it just one of those things that was great, in it's day?
I have been told that the CObra 2000 as well at the Cobra 148 had & still does have the best tramsmit audio available.
Even in todays standards.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Highlander
Advanced Member
Username: Highlander

Post Number: 609
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Friday, September 17, 2004 - 7:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Both can be made to sound fantastic, and both can be butchered and clipped into oblivion. Comparing the two when both are set up properly would probably be a matter of opinion as to which was better.

Where the Cobra 2000/148 chassis really shines is in the receiver section. Some people like to say it "blows away" the receiver in the RCI exports. I disagree with that, but under some conditions, the receiver of the 2000/148 will "do" better with respect to selectivity, Noise blanking, audio quality, etc.

Having owned both, my solution is to continue to own both.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob_p
Intermediate Member
Username: Bob_p

Post Number: 391
Registered: 7-2004


Posted on Friday, September 17, 2004 - 9:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have both and RCI 2970DX and a Philippine made Cobra 148 GTL. I also have a friend who has both a 148 GTL and an RCI 2950 so I got to compare the two.

The Cobra sounds great with a D-104 Silver Eagle on it, but the same microphone makes his RCI 2950 sound thin and scratchy. But when he put his Turner Supersidekeick on the RCI it smokes the Cobra 100%. However on the Cobra the Turner sounds thin and scratchy. Hmmm I have to say the RCI really does sound better with the right microphone but getting the right microphone can be a challenge.

As far as receive I think they both have great receive the RCI is very clear and sharp. Some people might say harsh and over sensitive, but there is no mud in the receiver. It sounds better with the Ranger external speaker on it. It really sounds good a little deeper but still very clear and sharp. I don’t believe the Cobra is as sensitive as the RCI, and is easier on the ears. But I believe you can pick up distant or weak stations easier with the RCI.

Just my opinion
73
Bob
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech548
Moderator
Username: Tech548

Post Number: 294
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Saturday, September 18, 2004 - 1:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have to second Highlander's opinion. Both can transmit some very good audio if set up correctly.

And as far as comparing the two receivers, the Uniden built 148/2000 and Grant radios easily beat out the 10Mtr radios. You can't have a tight receiver (Uniden) and 3-4 hundred channels (10Mtr) at the same time.

In my opinion, RCI has always had one of the better transmitters but they also have always had one of the worse receivers in the industry.....and they still do. That's one of the reasons why Channel Guard Kits are on the market. The purpose of these Channel Guard kits is to correct the receiver screw-up that you get free when buying any 10Mtr radio. These Channel Guard Kits will tighten up any 10Mtr radio's receiver for farrrrrr better adjacent channel rejection.

In reality, these 'kits' shouldn't have to be kits at all. They are something the manufactures save money on by putting in cheaper IF crystal filters. And that's the name of the game...saving manufacturing costs.

It's too bad that these 10Mtr radio manufacturers don't follow the lead of RF Limited and install better crystal filters during production.

Jeff
Tech548
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gonzo
Junior Member
Username: Gonzo

Post Number: 16
Registered: 9-2004
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2004 - 8:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"And as far as comparing the two receivers, the Uniden built 148/2000 and Grant radios easily beat out the 10Mtr radios. You can't have a tight receiver (Uniden) and 3-4 hundred channels (10Mtr) at the same time.

In my opinion, RCI has always had one of the better transmitters but they also have always had one of the worse receivers in the industry.....and they still do."

I agree with this 100%
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kilowatt
Junior Member
Username: Kilowatt

Post Number: 17
Registered: 2-2004
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2004 - 12:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I've owned a bunch of Rangers, and a bunch of Cobra 2000/148 GTL and Grant radios. In my opinion, the Rangers are some of the worst 10/11 meter transceivers ever made! The receivers are extremely poor. However, the transmit sections aren't that bad. Personally, I would prefer to have a better receiver, though.

The Uniden-based radios are as close to perfect as can be had for AM. On SSB, they can hang with my System 600 Yaesu, but the FT 920 whips them. (Of course the FT 920 is a $1,700 radio and a Grant is $149.00, so it is not really fair to compare them.)

Of course, this is my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary, etc. However, out of all of the radios I've owned, I've kept the President Grant Classic the longest (15 years), and I'll never part with it unless I have to!

My idea of torture is trying to run a Ranger 2950DX on SSB while driving down the interstate. The bleedover from channel 19 will kill me - even if I am on 10 meters! If I use my Grant, I can operate right next to channel 19 and I get no bleedover!!!!

Anyway, this is my opinion...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob_p
Intermediate Member
Username: Bob_p

Post Number: 424
Registered: 7-2004


Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2004 - 6:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I can honestly say I don't have that sort of bleed over problem with my 2970DX. I do get bleed over from out of control spanish speaking stations on AM one or two channels over, but it's never been a real problem. I also had the same problem with my Cobra 148 GTL from those same stations.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Twa77
Intermediate Member
Username: Twa77

Post Number: 120
Registered: 1-2003
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2004 - 10:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

kilowatt

you must have read my mind to a tee. i had that exact experience with a 2950. i had a grant, replaced it with a 2950 for a week or so . i was wondering "what the heck is all this darn noise." needless to say the grant is back and i haven't looked back. rci can ki-- -- ---. by the way i ended up selling the rci back to the guy i bought it from. I guess i got lucky
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kilowatt
Junior Member
Username: Kilowatt

Post Number: 26
Registered: 2-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 - 12:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I ended up selling my 2950DX. Lots of folks like those things, but I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that doesn't!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Skipman
New member
Username: Skipman

Post Number: 1
Registered: 7-2005
Posted on Monday, August 01, 2005 - 5:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Comparing a 148/2000 PB-0 board receiver to a rci receiver is simply like a lexus to a yugo...The uniden blows them away. Then again years have passed rci makes broadbanded rigs moderately priced but the transmiters are dirty especially the ones with the amp built in. To me the uniden is superior guality.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Yankee
Advanced Member
Username: Yankee

Post Number: 776
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, August 01, 2005 - 9:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I can't begin to talk about the technical end or the whys or where fors. But the reports I've been reading from the CEF members I've talked to. Says it all for the Uniden sideband radios that are the same radio as the Cobra 2000GTL, mine being the Uniden Grant XL and a Silver Eagle. These Uniden sideband radios are just good all around performers.
Carl CEF-357
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dale
Intermediate Member
Username: Dale

Post Number: 164
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Tuesday, August 02, 2005 - 4:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

i dont think rangers the worst..galaxys are the
worst imho.no intelligence were put into effort
when building these radios especailly with ssb.the reciewver section are noisey then top all that off they put toys in them a 12 yr old kid would think is stupid.i think rangers like the 2950dx ,lincolns,hr2510,hr2600 rangerar3500
are the best of the best while most are no longer made thier quailty wont be duplicated
again just my 2 cents worth
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sparkomatic
Intermediate Member
Username: Sparkomatic

Post Number: 423
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Thursday, October 04, 2007 - 7:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Older style 148 and 2000s are by far the best receivers out there. Audio wise the same deal.
Of course they are out of production and it's tough to find ones that have not been hacked.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Penrider
Intermediate Member
Username: Penrider

Post Number: 221
Registered: 1-2007


Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 3:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The old saying goes..."If it works, stop making it." My 148's old and new, grant, pc-122, trucker, president and uniden washington (all basically the same receivers as 2000's) have much better adjacent channel rejection and general receive strength than my pre-dx 2970. The 2970's receiver is stronger, but it brings in all the trash with it. Output power doesn't apply here. The 2970 can be very loud, properly tuned. About the same as my 148's. All my Unidens and the President Stomp the 2970 for loud, clear audio. The unidens, cobra, and president are all very stable on ssb out of the box. I, personally, haven't had issues with spurs or harmonic signals from the 2970 but I have heard many other people speak otherwise about that. To put it simply, if you have or can get quality examples of the older style ssb radios Keep Them! The RCI's, Galaxy's, etc are good or bad per personal opinion but that's what's available now. The older style radios are not coming back and are getting more rare by the minute.
Sean
CEF867

Two tin cans and a string, it's still a contact...BTW, I need my can back when we're done!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dale
Senior Member
Username: Dale

Post Number: 1195
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 4:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

sorry i misread the question.i absolutely agree
the rci does have great audio.but the reciever
stinks badly compared to a grant/148.ive also
experienced really bad bleedover from 19
while on 13 during cef net.needless to say
back to my uniden for cef nets
dale/a.k.a.hotrod
cef426
cvc#64
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walterb
New member
Username: Walterb

Post Number: 3
Registered: 12-2007
Posted on Sunday, December 16, 2007 - 12:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The receiver on a 148/2000 uses crystal lattice filter and all the other cb's and 10 meter exports use a different type of filter for both AM/SSB. The design of the 148/2000 in the first IF stage is 7.8 med which should bring in more noise but it uses a crystal filter which makes for a quieter receive. The exports use a 10.4 first IF stage and use a less expansive filter because the front end brings in less noise. A good export radio will bring in signals farther away in a side by side test on SSB with both radios set up to stock specifications. The Magnum S9 radios seem to have a better receiver than any of the export or 10 meter radios that I have heard on AM. My S-45 does a very good job for a radio that has a micro processer in it for pulling in week signals....I have just ordered an S9 so will test it against my Cobra 148 and my S-45 when it arives for sure...walterb
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walterb
Junior Member
Username: Walterb

Post Number: 17
Registered: 12-2007
Posted on Saturday, January 26, 2008 - 12:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have done receive testing over the last month on the Cobra 148, Cobra 2000GTL, Cobra 200GTL, a S-45 and an S-9. My rating is best first is Cobra 2000, 148, 200GTL, S-45 and S-9. All have good to excellent receive on AM and most people will be happy with any of these radios used as a base radio. Used as a mobile the Cobra 148GTL I still like the best for pulling out those week stations on AM!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mrclean
Intermediate Member
Username: Mrclean

Post Number: 132
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Sunday, July 18, 2010 - 1:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I run a stock Grant Xl and love it. Use it on the base most the time. I agree with them being great radios and the same inside as the 2000. Very good recieve and on transmit maybe not the loudest audio but very clean and clear. I love mine and thats why I own 3 of them. Getting one tricked out as we speak and the other two will remain bone stock with alittle tweak on the mod.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: