| Author |
Message |
    
Barefoot
| | Posted on Tuesday, February 12, 2002 - 2:41 pm: | 
|
Which is better ? Less noise? BAREFOOT |
Ncrebel
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 13, 2002 - 1:33 pm: |
|
Well,I've never tried a Wilson,but I want to try one.I'm currently talkin on a K40 "K30" antenna.
It works great,but looking at the design of the
Wilson I think the Wilson would probally work better.Again,I never tried the Wilson,but it looks
better than a K40 on paper. |
Warlock
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 13, 2002 - 5:08 am: |
|
I think both perform nearly equal, the Wilson is much more durable. |
Tech181
| | Posted on Friday, February 15, 2002 - 12:21 pm: |
|
NCrebel,
I personally recommend the Wilson, however the coax and PL-259 assembly is prone to problems. The coax loosens up. If you are going to install one radio and not have to disconnect the coax much you'll be fine.
Steve
Tech181
Tech181@copperelectronics.com |
Barefoot
| | Posted on Sunday, February 17, 2002 - 9:32 am: |
|
I installed a new K40 yesterday seems to work fine I have run a wilson 1000 for years and the K40 seems to have less static I am using a lincoln, also have a HR2510 & Hr2600 great radios |
|
