Copper Talk » Ask The Tech » Antennas » Signal engineering super hawk or maco 103c beam « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Airplane1
Intermediate Member
Username: Airplane1

Post Number: 217
Registered: 5-2004
Posted on Saturday, November 06, 2004 - 7:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I am thinking of getting signal engineering superhawk or maco 103c beam antenna, any info on these two antennas would be helpful like which is better of the two and build quality ect.

Thanks,Roger
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

2ir473
Member
Username: 2ir473

Post Number: 62
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Sunday, November 07, 2004 - 8:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Roger,
I can offer some info on the Maco 103c, since I got one from Copper a few years ago.
I was impressed with it's performance, especially for the price.
It is relatively easy to assemble and tune. I had mine up on a 36' push up pole and used a simple RS tv rotator, so it didn't cost a whole lot extra to get it up on the air.
All I can guess about the Superhawk is that it looks like a PDL-2 antenna, and they were very good antennas offering horizontal & vertical polarity. They are a bit more tricky to assemble and can be subject to damage in more severe climates.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gonzo
Intermediate Member
Username: Gonzo

Post Number: 113
Registered: 9-2004


Posted on Friday, November 19, 2004 - 4:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I purchased a Signal engineering Superhawk, and I am assembling it now. I should have it up in a few days. Construction quality is fair. But it should work relatively well I think. I have had a PDL 2 quad, and still have one NIB that I'm keeping. The PDL 2 quad was a very good antenna.

A 2 ele quad has slightly less gain than a 3 element yagi, but is quieter and recieves skip stations more effectively. However 2ir473 is right about climate damage.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Airplane1
Intermediate Member
Username: Airplane1

Post Number: 220
Registered: 5-2004
Posted on Monday, November 22, 2004 - 8:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gonzo,
Let me know when you get it up and working, let me know what you think of it.
Thanks, Roger
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nobody077
Junior Member
Username: Nobody077

Post Number: 23
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Monday, December 06, 2004 - 10:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I ran a SuperHawk for a few months, and Personaly dident like it. Im not sure if they have changed the matching system or not but about 5 years ago when I got mine every time the wind would blow or I would turn the antenna the match would change, and it was very picky to the distance above ground. I had it on a 60ft crankup and would need to find the sweet spot by cranking the tower up and down until the SWR's would get good.
Maybe I had a bad antenna, not sure.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: