| Author |
Message |
    
Carls86fiero
Member
Username: Carls86fiero
Post Number: 60
Registered: 3-2005
| | Posted on Sunday, June 12, 2005 - 1:34 pm: | 
|
Not to sure if this Question has been asked or not. But these two amps use different transitors. just want to know if one is better than the other or not..
cef 536 |
Crackerjack
Advanced Member
Username: Crackerjack
Post Number: 658
Registered: 7-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, June 12, 2005 - 2:00 pm: |
|
I like the 203, Carl. It is more forgiving of the RF power input -to the amp. |
Fusebreaker
Member
Username: Fusebreaker
Post Number: 80
Registered: 3-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 10:14 pm: |
|
I agree with crackerjack 100% the 203 is a good little amplifire.I look at it this way the pre-amp on the 200 aint something you need if your radio has a good rx.I put a 203 behind my dx-959 and man i would talk i had truckers saying WOW!! |
1861
Intermediate Member
Username: 1861
Post Number: 300
Registered: 2-2004
| | Posted on Friday, August 19, 2005 - 8:10 am: |
|
DEFINATLY 203 |
