Author |
Message |
Teham
Junior Member Username: Teham
Post Number: 18 Registered: 1-2004
| Posted on Friday, July 09, 2004 - 10:13 am: |
|
Hmmmm. Real radios glow in the dark. I have both. I can only think of one draw back. Tubes do get hot. However, tubes don't care how hot or cold it is they always work. Hook up both side by side and compare. Tubes are more forgiving, have better cross channel rejection, filtered better, have better receive as hear less static, audio is crisp and clear. You can't beat the sound of glass. Parts. Try buying some older IC's and transistors. Haven't seen many parts that you can't find for tube equipment. I have several tube radios made in the 60's that still work very well. I wonder if there will be as many transistor stuff running at that age? Tony |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1349 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Friday, July 09, 2004 - 3:09 pm: |
|
Teham ! PLEASE ! Tubes are NOISEGENERATORS god i can remember using a 417b ( W2AZL ) converter it was state of the art and it was good for about 3 db ( NF ). Today a CHEAP GASFET under a buck will do about .4! Now i cut my teeth on tubes my first station was a S-38 with a one tube CW transmitter ( 807 ) and a heath Q MULTIPLYER using it as a BFO. O it kinda worked only made one contact ...... it wasnt untill i bought a ARC-3 and BC-348 and amico 2 meter conveter that i got my first dx and that was on 2 meters..... and im not even talking about my he-15 or he-20 wich i still have one day ill RESTORE them. OK my Drake line (1970 ) R4B, T4XB and a bunch of excessors was a cool radio but against my FT-840 FORGETIT there is nothing that radio could do that the 840 can't do 10 times as well. As for SOUND ? well look at the speakers that came with radios like my HQ-140 12 inch speakers in closed box! You know i think tubes are cool but also a leftover from another time ..... and if current trends continue in 25 years most will be gone. |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 764 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, July 09, 2004 - 5:39 pm: |
|
I am partial to tube equipment for my hobby use. I am partial to solid state gear for professional use. I am looking forward to using my restored tube radio on the AM net this Sunday. |
Pig040
Intermediate Member Username: Pig040
Post Number: 489 Registered: 7-2003
| Posted on Saturday, July 10, 2004 - 10:36 am: |
|
What will cause the demise of tube equipment is not the performance, rather it will be the lack of techs to work on them. I finally gave up on My Yaesu, because of that reason. I still run two tube amps, but if there is ever a problem, I will probably go solid state on those too. I do think tube amps have a better sound, and bleed less, my opinion! Rich |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 767 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Saturday, July 10, 2004 - 2:48 pm: |
|
Tube receivers have that smooooth tube sound. Mrs. 833 can listen to SW for hours when I am using one of my tube radios, but when I try to listen on a solid state SW radio, she tells me to put on headphones. I am becomming a bit of an audiophile now as well. Just recently, I began to really dive in to hi-fi. I have owned tube hi-fi components ever since high school, but just recently began to really study the art of fine reproduction. I have found that tube amps have more second order harmonics than solid state while solid state has much more 3rd. harmonic content. Second order harmonics are pleasing to the ear while 3rd. order is shrill and tiring to the ear. Also, tube amps can produce the rise side of instant peaks much faster than solid state amps. These reasons may explain some of the hi-fi crowd's facination with tubes. As far as RF goes, I see no difference between the tube and solid state transmitters. Except for audio from tube transmitters typically is smoother. Not as loud though. Power supply tilt is the worst loudness-robbing factor in tube AM transmitters. |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1352 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Sunday, July 11, 2004 - 1:26 pm: |
|
|
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1353 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Sunday, July 11, 2004 - 2:17 pm: |
|
oops it didnt send it |
Galaxyraider
Junior Member Username: Galaxyraider
Post Number: 45 Registered: 1-2003
| Posted on Sunday, July 18, 2004 - 12:19 am: |
|
Most people don't realize that 80% of the radio stations AM and FM still use Tubes for their transmitters. They are superior to solid state for Audio quality. And Outright RF Power from a solid state transmitter doesn't reduce the size of the transmitters much at these stations. Take a tour of a local radio station some day ask to see the transmitter. Don't be surprised to see the finals are TUBES! --- Let me add this --- I spend about 80% of my life at radio and TV stations. Most high power transmitters made today are tube type. However, solid state has taken over all low and medium power lines. The truth is, as far as audio quality, on FM it makes no difference since the transmitter is basically a linear amplifier. The exciter determines the audio quality, and there has not been new tube type exciters on the air since the 60's. As far as AM, Broadcast Electronics new class E design blows the doors off any tube transmitter in audio quality. Tube type AM transmitters suffer from power supply tilt which robs loudness or quality. You can EQ with tilt EQ adjustments, but you lose audio quality doing that too. Tech 833 |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 771 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Sunday, July 18, 2004 - 1:50 am: |
|
Oh, let me add one more thing... I have now installed a few of the B.E. 1 KW AM transmitters. They are rack mount and about the size of a microwave oven. And they don't break. Well, only a couple times. |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1373 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Sunday, July 18, 2004 - 2:27 am: |
|
Tubes have one last outpost and thats high power finals. As far as receivers tubes are gone and will stay that way. |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 781 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - 11:19 am: |
|
Yes Bruce. Except at my house. BTW, I just found a big spool of wire with a note I was supposed to send it to you. I think I blew it! Did I drop the ball on you? Please email your address so I can get this to you if I am supposed to. Looks like about 60 feet of longwire material. My shop was in disarray until this last weekend. |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1387 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, July 20, 2004 - 7:31 pm: |
|
I like tube recievers i OWN a classic one a R-390 as well as a HO-140 but as far as today my FT-840 will keep up with ANY tube rig. PS you DO owe me that wire HE HE HE my address under my call listed at QRZ IS CORRECT
|
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 785 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Thursday, July 22, 2004 - 2:50 pm: |
|
Got your email Bruce. Thank you. Having just completed a move and moving my shop for the first time in 11 years (and hopefully the last), things are unearthing themselves that I forgot I had. Projects too. Add to that, I am still swamped with projects for about 17 stations right now and personally building 2 from the ground up. My brain power is spread thin. Thanks for the help. |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 1396 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Thursday, July 22, 2004 - 6:55 pm: |
|
833 I know the brain drain well mine CLEARS when my sugar does a flip ..... Sunday my sugar hit 600 then droped to 68. Yep I was hurting but you know us radio types ...... give us a mike and a place to plug the coffin in and were set to go! Well next here is to get my shack moved and tile that 25 foot floor....... and install a sound proof door between me and the rest of the house! Ahh quite .......... HE HE HE |
Teham
Intermediate Member Username: Teham
Post Number: 125 Registered: 1-2004
| Posted on Thursday, May 05, 2011 - 2:59 am: |
|
I have a kenwood ts 140s next to my swan 350c. Receive is better on the swan with less noise. receive audio is far less shrill and transmit audio is far superior. If transistors are bett then why are they using tubes in stereo applications again?? tony/n5jva/cef 259 |
Radioreddz
Intermediate Member Username: Radioreddz
Post Number: 100 Registered: 9-2006
| Posted on Friday, May 06, 2011 - 12:41 am: |
|
on the subject of tubes what is the name of the Microphone that uses a tube for amplification. but i do love my tube radios much much better then mu solid state stuff, but just like finding a good tech to work on side band radios right it's even harder to find a good tube tech with out having to drive 3 hours or chance shipping it out. |
Tech237
Moderator Username: Tech237
Post Number: 1432 Registered: 4-2004
| Posted on Friday, May 06, 2011 - 11:03 am: |
|
Anyone close enough to me, I'll happily work on their tube equqipment.. Tech237 N7AUS God only made some many perfect head, on the rest he put hair.
|
Scrapiron63
Advanced Member Username: Scrapiron63
Post Number: 877 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Friday, May 06, 2011 - 2:14 pm: |
|
Speaking of tubes, I've got several old tube type receivers. One of them is a 1941 Philco console floor model radio. It has the AM standard band plus 3 shortwave bands. It was one of the first sets that had a remote control. The remote is made of wood and is nearly a foot square. The radio has 14 tubes and even the remote has one tube. Here's a picture of the old remote compared to a tv remote. |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 1965 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Saturday, May 07, 2011 - 8:22 am: |
|
Hey Scrap, Interesting, your remote control (Philco called it the "Mystery Control") has labels from N. California. Primarily San Francisco area. Out of all those call letters, the only station that has not changed calls since your remote was labeled (same calls on same signal) is KGO. Your radio 'Mythbuster' since 1998
|
Scrapiron63
Advanced Member Username: Scrapiron63
Post Number: 877 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Sunday, May 08, 2011 - 1:34 pm: |
|
Paul: When I got that radio I looked up those calls and was surprised at their location. I bought the Philco radio along with a 1937 Wards Airline floor model at an estate sale here in Arkansas. So they were a long way from their original home. The Philco has 8 pushbottons that you set and then the remote goes to those presets. You turn the dial like an old telephone, hold down the stop and it sends a signal to the radio. IT would also work the volumn. I got the radio working but didn't mess with the remote very much. It has to have a weird voltage battery, can't rememeber what it is right now. I've seen the remotes sell on ebay for more than I gave for the radio and remote. I'll post a couple pictures of the Philco radio. Scrapiron
|
Keithinatlanta
Advanced Member Username: Keithinatlanta
Post Number: 916 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 - 6:38 am: |
|
Scrapiron, what a great looking cabinet!!!!!! I wish manufacturers would still put tv's in nice consoles again. Imagine a big screen tv in a beautiful wood cabinet with speakers on each end and out the back. Young people would not know how to handle something like that! Keith in Atlanta CEF 150 |
Tech833
Moderator Username: Tech833
Post Number: 1983 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 - 11:26 am: |
|
Keith, The latest trend is for thinner, hang-it-on-the-wall style TV sets. The downside is, as TVs get thinner and thinner, the speakers are smaller and smaller. The newest Sony thin screen (like 1/2 inch thick) has speakers found in cell phones. The sound is shreekingly horrible. Now, they recommend using a set of amplified computer speakers plugged into the TVs. That is reverse-progression! Your radio 'Mythbuster' since 1998
|